Sous le phare durkheimien. La sociologie française au prisme du Centre d’études sociologiques (1946-1955)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les études sur le Centre d’études sociologiques dans les années 1950, l’institution est souvent présentée comme le premier « laboratoire » de sociologie, la matrice d’une refondation « disciplinaire » après la guerre. À partir des archives du Centre plus que des témoignages de ses anciens membres, le présent article discute cette perspective en montrant comment l’institution doit être pensée, au moins jusqu’à la moitié des années 1950, dans la continuité des modes de fonctionnement scientifiques qui prévalaient dans l’entre-deux-guerres. Afin de faire ressortir les filiations savantes entretenues avec la tradition durkheimienne, l’auteur s’appuie notamment sur la trajectoire du géographe Max Sorre, qui dirigea le CES jusqu’en 1956.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".