MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7074578991

Power transformer condition monitoring by 2FAL content and CO2/CO ratio – A fuzzy logic approac

2020· other· en· W7074578991 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConstellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerFuzzy logicCondition monitoringFuzzy inference systemFuzzy inferenceService life
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The condition of the solid insulation paper within transformers can be directly determined from the degree of polymerization (DP) measured from samples. Since this is difficult for in service units, many studies have been performed in regard with indirectly measuring the degradation of paper insulation by chemical markers for several decades. The 2-FAL concentration is being used decades ago. In this contribution, condition monitoring history and experience with transformer fleets are reported for a service aging of 75 years. 37 oil-filled transformers (146.7 kV to 157 kV) of a Canadian utility were periodically monitored. As part of the maintenance of the apparatus, the analysis of the furanic compounds is carried out. These are obtained by high performance liquid chromatography in a laboratory, with a regularity that varies according to the age of the transformer. This article deals with a transformer aging evaluation tool built from fuzzy logic. A fuzzy inference system is implemented by taking as input the values of 2-FAL and CO 2 /CO ratio. The tool helps directly providing the paper condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207