'mit Zelt und Rucksack am Ufer der Duna' Zur Bedeutung des Neonomaden bei Bas Böttcher
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2009, German spoken-word poet Bas Böttcher published his most recent volume of poetry; a slender book accompanied by a CD and entitled Neonomade. As a spoken-word poet who, in 2010 alone, combined numerous performances in German-speaking countries with international appearances in India, Namibia, Italy, Greece, France, Luxembourg and Canada, the eponymous neo-nomad can be interpreted as a reference to Böttcher’s own hectic tour schedule. Yet, given the prominent thematic role of mobility in Böttcher’s own work, the title also reflects a central thematic concern that Bartl has identified in the introduction to her edited volume Transitträume as a key characteristic of present-day society: mobility, life in transit (2009, 10). As members of today’s mobile society (Mobilitätsgesellschaft; Tully u. Baier 2006), in which concepts such as home, place, distance and proximity have acquired new meaning, Böttcher’s protagonists frequently find themselves confronted with redefined concepts of communication, inter-personal relationships and reality. In spite of the advent of numerous forms of virtual communication that allow for the separation of message and messenger, as well as messenger and recipient, reliable and effective communication still depends on the co-presence of all three elements (Urry in B J Sociol 54(2):155–173, 2003). Through a discussion of the volume’s title, I explain the importance of “new nomadism” for the communicatory success of the contemporary spoken-word poem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".