MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7074585771

Essays on international economics and industrial organization

2007· other· en· W7074585771 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionWork (physics)TSG101LimitingGloomProductivity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation addresses two issues in international economics and one issue in industrial organization. The first two chapters use sticky-price intertemporal optimizing models with incomplete financial markets to analyze the dynamics of the current account after technology shocks and the effects of the optimal monetary policy on current account movements. The third chapter models the upgrade behavior of existing software users and new software users under two market structures. The first chapter studies a small open economy with two sectors. In a perfect foresight, rational expectation general equilibrium model, with sticky prices in the non-traded goods sector, the evolution of the current account following a positive technology shock is efficient even without time consistent optimal monetary policy. The second chapter extends the general equilibrium model to a two-country economy and analyzes the effects of the optimal monetary policy on current account dynamics. The welfare gain for home households from the individual optimal expansionary monetary policy mainly comes from the home country's terms of trade improvement when most firms price the export prices in buyer currency. The third chapter finds that, for the new software version, the software vendor should offer a price discount to existing users and charge a higher price to new users if software users are sufficiently heterogeneous. For the old software version, a price discount should be applied to existing users with a higher price to new users if the price of the co-existing new version is high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→