Las transformaciones sufridas en los edificios del casco histórico de Lugo en el segundo cuarto del siglo XX, a través de los expedientes de obras del ayuntamiento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sometimes the files of municipal works allow us to know the appearance, almost always external, the main façade, but also the distribution of the interior spaces, of buildings that will be demolished to be replaced by new ones. Although it was not obligatory to do so, the architects in some cases show us the current state that that old building offered and next to it the appearance of the new one to be built. It almost always happens with baroque buildings, now lost, rarely documented, which in any case aroused the interest of these professionals, demonstrating a special sensitivity in this regard. The alterations produced in the openings are much more frequent, especially on the ground floors, which will undergo major transformations when the shops located in them are updated. . Through these drawings, it is possible to reconstruct the original appearance of an important part of these buildings and recover that of others that unfortunately disappeared, in a few years, the second quarter of the 20th century, in which their valuation and conservation were far from the current ones. Through this type of documentation we study what happened in the city of Lugo, focusing on its historic center, within the enclosure that surrounds its walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".