Acreditación Internacional: El caso de la agencia de acreditación canadiense CCPE-CEAB en las universidades costarricenses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las tendencias mundiales han motivado a las instituciones de educación superior a replantear su labor académica y el perfil profesional con el que sus estudiantes inician su práctica profesional, en búsqueda de una mayor calidad. La necesidad de que las universidades garanticen a la sociedad profesionales de alta calidad, con capacidad para desempeñarse, tanto en el contexto nacional como en el internacional, ha propuesto que algunas carreras utilicen estándares internacionales para la evaluación de sus programas. El propósito de este artículo es presentar algunos de los resultados de la investigación denominada, “Contextualización de los sistemas de acreditación internacional: el caso de la agencia de acreditación canadiense CCPE-CEAB en las universidades costarricenses”, realizada en el marco del curso CAMINA-Costa Rica 2002. En esta investigación, se analizó cómo el Sistema de Acreditación Canadiense CEAB, especializado en ingeniería, ha influido en algunos de los programas de Ingeniería de distintas universidades de Costa Rica. The world's trends have motivated the college level institutions to rearrange their academic activities, and to review the student's profile regarding their professional practices, in search of improvement. The need for universities vouching to society high-quality professionals, professionals that capable of performing adequately in national and international contexts, has made some careers to seek evaluations by international standards of their programs. The purpose of this article is to present some of the results of the project named “Contextualization of the international certification systems: the case of the Canadian CCPE-CEAB certification agency in Costa Rican universities”, which was carried out within the framework of the Camina-2000 course. In this investigation, the manner in which Canadian CEAB Certification System has influenced some of the engineering programs in several Costa Rica 's universities was analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".