MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7075279775

Denizli ve Çevresinde Yer Alan Bazı Câmilerin Yapı Elemanlarının Değerlendirmesi

2017· article· tr· W7075279775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@FSM (FSM Vakif University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Section (typography)Qualitative analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Denizli ve çevresinde bulunan birçoğu vakıf yapısı olarak inşa edilen, bilgi ve belgelerine ulaşılabilen
\nbir grup cami, yapı elemanları açısından düz tavanlı ve kubbeli camiler olarak gruplandırılması
\nsonrası yetmiş bir düz tavanlı, beş kubbeli cami tespit edilmiştir. Düz tavanlı camiler de kendi
\niçerisinde göbeksiz, tekne tavanlı, kubbeli tavanlı, kademeli tavanlı, çıtalı göbekli tavanlı ve tonozlu
\ntavanlı şeklinde sınıflandırılmaya gidilmiştir. Her iki ana grup düz tavanlı ve kubbeli camiler; örtü
\ndüzeni ve taşıyıcı elemanlar, malzeme ve teknik bakımından incelenmiştir. İncelenen eserlerin en
\nerken tarihlisi 13.yüzyıl, en geç tarihlisi ise 20.yüzyılın ikinci yarısına tarihlenmektedir. Çalışma yöredeki
\nbenzer yapılardaki yapı elemanları ile ilgili genel bir fikir vermesi ve bazı yapıların ilk kez
\nbelgelenmesi açısından oldukça önem arz etmektedir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0110.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it