Age and sex differences in neural stem cell transplantation: a descriptive study in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jay Waldron1, Laurent Lecanu1,21Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2McGill University Health Centre, Department of Medicine, QC, CanadaPurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether neural stem cell (NSC) sexual dimorphism previously demonstrated in vitro translates in vivo in NSC transplantation experiments and constitutes a defining factor of the transplantation outcome.Methods: NSCs isolated from the subventricular zone of 2-day-old or 20-month-old male and female rats were grown as neurospheres prior to being transplanted in the striatum of 2-day-old or 20-month-old male and female recipient animals. The outcome of the transplantation and the NSC differentiation status were analyzed 8 weeks later by assessing the expression of the markers doublecortin (DCX) for neuroblasts, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for astrocytes, nestin for stem cells, and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) for neuronal cholinergic phenotype by immunofluorescence.Results: No NSCs were detected in the brain of rat pups 8 weeks after transplantation. However, the endogenous neurogenesis was dramatically increased in a sex-dependent manner. These data suggest that the transplanted NSCs may have triggered endogenous neurogenesis by the intermediate growth factors they may have produced or the production they may have induced. However, NSCs transplanted into the striatum of adult rats were detectable at week 8. NSC survival was dependent on the sex and age of the donor and the recipient. Some of the transplanted cells were found to express DCX, GFAP, and ChAT, supporting an ongoing differentiation process toward astroglial and neuronal cholinergic phenotypes.Conclusion: The outcome of the NSC transplantation was highly dependent on the sex and age of the combination donor/recipient. Data generated from our work may allow us in the future to answer the question “What NSCs and for whom?” and consequently lead to the optimization of the grafting process and improvement of the clinical prognosis.Keywords: sexual dimorphism, neurogenesis, brain repair, stem cell graft
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".