MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7075599032

The Neopalatial architectural and ceramic sequence at Malia. New insights from Area Pi

2024· article· en· W7075599032 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationSettlement (finance)Sequence (biology)StratigraphyQuarter (Canadian coin)Sequence stratigraphyAssemblage (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exploration of Area Pi, a residential quarter within the Bronze Age settlement of Malia, on the North-eastern coast of Crete, started in 2005 for six seasons of excavation (2005, 2007-2008, 2010, 2014 and 2020). These excavation campaigns alternated with study seasons which all involved several specialists of different kinds of archaeological artifacts and paleoenvironmental ecofacts, as well as a large team of students. This paper discusses the architectural and stratigraphical phasing of the Neopalatial occupation of this part of the settlement, and provides a new definition of the Neopalatial ceramic sequence at Malia based on the stratigraphy and the analyses of the ceramic assemblages excavated in Area Pi. Overall, the outcome of this research project makes it possible to propose a new scenario for the development of the town between the 17th and the 15th centuries BC. In broad terms, the study allows us to reconsider the different episodes of growth and turmoil of the major site of Malia within the general history of Minoan Neopalatial Crete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))Same topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207