MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7075647352

Parasites and diseases of the auks (Alcidae) of the world and their ecology - A review

2004· article· en· W7075647352 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBorreliaHelminthsPredationParasite hostingNematodeSeabirdCestoda
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We reviewed all the organisms that are known to parasitize auks (Aves: Alcidae). Of the 23 extant auk species, parasites have been described from 19 species; no published information was found on parasites of Xantus's Murrelet Synthliboramphus hypoleucus, Craveri's Murrelet S. craveri, the Japanese Murrelet S. wumizusume or the Long-billed Murrelet Brachyramphus perdix. Our survey identified 184 taxa parasitic or pathogenic on auks. Endoparasitic microorganisms included 21 viruses, 13 bacteria, 3 dinoflagellates, 6 protozoa and 3 fungi. Other endoparasitic organisms included 57 platyhelminth (34 digenean, 23 cestode), 9 acanthocephalan and 22 nematode taxa. Ectoparasites (all arthropods) included 2 pentastomid, 14 acari and 30 insect taxa. We reviewed published information on the effects that these parasites have on the biology of auks. Most studies did not investigate relationships between the ecology, the breeding condition or the physiologic state of the birds and the presence of parasites. Even though episodes of mass mortality of seabirds are periodically recorded, few of those episodes have been exclusively linked to parasitic infestations. Viral isolates from auks have been recorded from several breeding colonies, but their epizootiologic consequences are unknown. Bacterial isolates, of which the most noteworthy species is the Lyme disease-causing agent Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), have been recorded in auks and their tick ectoparasite Ixodes uriae. A few life cycles of digeneans and cestodes recorded from auks have been determined. Growing evidence indicates prey switching by auk species alters their endoparasitic fauna. Ectoparasitic organisms often play a role in transmitting endoparasites and may affect the reproductive success of their hosts. Some links have been clearly established; many others are only implied and urgently need close attention. The role of parasitism in host population dynamics and as reservoirs is discussed in the context of seabird ecology as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207