Crossing borderlands: composition and postcolonial studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composition and postcolonial studies : an introduction / Andrea A. Lunsford and Lahoucine Ouzgane -- Composing postcolonial studies / Min-Zhan Lu -- Toward a Mestiza rhetoric : Gloria Anzaldua on composition and postcoloniality / Andrea A. Lunsford -- Terms of engagement : postcolonialism, transnationalism, and composition studies / Deepika Bahri -- Encountering the other : postcolonial theory and composition scholarship / Gary Olson -- Pratt and pratfalls : revisioning contact zones / R. Mark Hall and Mary Rosner -- Beside ourselves : rhetoric and representation in postcolonial feminist writing / Susan Jarratt -- Postcolonial transformations in Canadian Inuit testimonio / Martin Behr -- (Im)migrant crossings / Aneil Rallin -- Resisting writing : reflections on the postcolonial factor in the writing class / David Dzaka -- Arts of the U.S. Mexico contact zone / Jaime Armin Mejia -- Hybridity : a lens for understanding Mestizo/a writers / Louise Rodriguez Connal -- The politics of location : Using flare-ups to spark "reflexive dialogue" in the ever-changing classroom text / Pamela Gay -- The new literacy/orality debates : ebonics and the redefinition of literacy in multicultural settings / Jan Swearingen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it