WATT: Weight Average Test-Time Adaptation of CLIP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP have yielded unprecedented performances for zero-shot image classification, yet their generalization capability may still be seriously challenged when confronted to domain shifts.In response, we present Weight Average Test-Time Adaptation (WATT) of CLIP, a new approach facilitating full test-time adaptation (TTA) of this VLM.Our method employs a diverse set of templates for text prompts, augmenting the existing framework of CLIP.Predictions are utilized as pseudo labels for model updates, followed by weight averaging to consolidate the learned information globally.Furthermore, we introduce a text ensemble strategy, enhancing the overall test performance by aggregating diverse textual cues.Our findings underscore the effectiveness of WATT across diverse datasets, including CIFAR-10-C, CIFAR-10.1,CIFAR-100-C, VisDA-C, and several other challenging datasets, effectively covering a wide range of domain shifts.Notably, these enhancements are achieved without the need for additional model transformations or trainable modules.Moreover, compared to other TTA methods, our approach can operate effectively with just a single image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".