MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7077046158 · doi:10.5683/sp3/xja1w6

Supplementary Material for "Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration among University of Montreal’s pediatric residents rotating through the pediatric intensive care unit: Mixed-method analysis of the current situation and recommendations for future innovative teaching-learning activities"

2025· dataset· en· W7077046158 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive careQualitative researchMEDLINECurrent (fluid)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This file contains all supplementary material supporting the publication of the aforementioned article, including a Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist, surveys and questionnaires used for the study, and supplemental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5170.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→