Breeding Rice Varieties for Low Nitrogen Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for rice growth, but the excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers has led to environmental degradation, increased costs, and diminishing returns. Root structure and the ability to maintain chlorophyll content are key indicators of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), while genes such as OsTCP19 , OsNAC68 , and TOND1 play important roles in nitrogen uptake and assimilation. Field and hydroponic trials, combined with high-throughput phenotyping technologies, are effective in evaluating genotypic variation and selecting superior varieties. Breeding strategies include conventional selection, marker-assisted selection (MAS), genomic selection (GS), and the introgression of favorable traits from wild or traditional rice varieties. The case of Swarna-Sub1 demonstrates the potential of integrated breeding for enhancing both stress resistance and NUE. Despite significant progress, breeding efforts still face challenges such as balancing high yield with NUE, shortening breeding cycles, and adapting to diverse ecological zones. Integrating genetic improvement with sustainable agronomic practices—such as precision fertilization and organic fertilizer application—can reduce nitrogen input while maintaining yield, offering a promising path toward green, economical, and efficient rice production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".