Exposure datasets representing a synthetic future urban context, including socio-demographic, building, and land-use data from 10 cities, for natural hazard risk modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dataset includes synthetically produced data from 10 different cities (Istanbul, Nablus, Chattogram, Cox’s Bazaar, Nairobi, Nakuru, Quito, Kokhana, Rapti and Darussalam) for a future urban context. The data includes physical elements in a city such as buildings, roads, and power networks, as well as social elements such as households and individuals. The dataset contains a maximum of 9 different data types, described below. For some cities power and road network data were not considered due to context specific priorities. landuse: The land use plan data depicting how the land will be zoned and used in the next fifty years within the area or interest. The attributes include the land use type, areal coverage in hectares, maximum population density and existing population. building: Data representing the building footprints that will emerge as a result of the future exposure generation procedure. It includes the attributes of the building such as its identifier number, construction type, number of floors, footprint area, occupation type and construction code level. road nodes: Data representing the points where road segments (edges) are connected to each other, including the identifier number for each node. road edges: Data representing the road segments, including the ID numbers of the starting and ending point (node). power nodes: Data representing the points where power lines (edges) are connected to each other, including the identifier number for each node. power edges: Data representing the power segments, including the including the ID numbers of the starting and ending point (node). household: Data that contains social attributes of a household living in a building. The attributes include number of individuals, income level and commonly used facility ID (such as hospital). individual: Data that contains the attributes of the individuals that are a part of a household. The attributes are age, gender, school ID (if relevant), workplace ID (if relevant) and last attained education level. Distribution table: The future projections for each city that identifies the socio-demographic changes and expected physical development in the next 50 years. The data can be used in geospatial platforms. The nomenclature for the data is as follows: “CitynameFutureExposureDataset/Cityname_CommunityCode_DataType”. This dataset was created as case studies for the Tomorrows Cities: Tomorrowville virtual testbed. It is supported by NERC as part of the GCRF Urban Disaster Risk Hub (NE/S009000/1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".