MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7077165818 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16928241

Hellwigia strobilacea Senjaya & A. D. Poulsen 2025, comb. nov.

2025· article· en· W7077165818 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologistZingiberaceaeKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hellwigia strobilacea (K. Schum.) Senjaya & A. D. Poulsen comb. nov. Alpinia strobilacea K. Schum., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 27: 295 1899 (Basionym). Type: Indonesia. West Papua, Andai, O. Beccari 522 (lectotype: designated by Cecchi et al. Plant Biosyst. 156 (3): 785 2022. FI! [FI 008320]). Eriolopha seticalyx Ridl., Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 9: 221 1916. Alpinia seticalyx (Ridl.) Loes., Nat. Pflanzenfam. ed. 2, 15 a: 620 1930. Type: Indonesia. Papua: Utakwa River to Mt. Carstenz, Canoe Camp, C. B. Kloss s. n. (Nov 1912) (lectotype: designated by Smith, Edin. J. Bot. 47 (1): 58 1990, K! [K 000292430]; isolectotype: BM! [BM 000617296]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→