MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7077277381 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16932082

Shifting Alliances: The role of non-regional powers in sahel security after ECOWAS departures

2025· article· en· W7077277381 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeopoliticsInternational securityPoliticsChinaLeverage (statistics)Economic securityNational securityEnergy securityGreat powerCompetition (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The security landscape of the Sahel region is undergoing a profound transformation following the withdrawal of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) from several member states. This shift has created a power vacuum, prompting non-regional actors—most notably Russia, France, and China—to redefine their roles in regional stability and governance. These external powers leverage military, economic, and diplomatic strategies to secure influence, often pursuing competing agendas that reshape security dynamics and political alignments in the region. Russia has expanded its footprint through military cooperation and security agreements, capitalizing on rising anti-Western sentiments and disillusionment with traditional partners. The Wagner Group, a Russian paramilitary force, has played an increasing role in counterterrorism operations and regime protection, particularly in Mali and Burkina Faso. Meanwhile, France, historically entrenched in the Sahel through Operation Barkhane and bilateral security agreements, faces diminishing influence as local governments pivot toward alternative partnerships. French disengagement has sparked new geopolitical realignments, with some states actively seeking security support beyond their former colonial ties. China's involvement, while less overtly military, focuses on economic statecraft and infrastructure investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Through financial aid, arms sales, and economic diplomacy, China seeks to maintain strategic relationships while avoiding direct military entanglement. As competition among these actors intensifies, the Sahel’s security trajectory remains uncertain, with implications for regional stability, counterterrorism efforts, and governance. This study examines the evolving role of non-regional powers in Sahel security post-ECOWAS, analyzing their strategic interests, engagement tactics, and the broader geopolitical consequences of their involvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→