Análisis geomorfológico del cañón Sloggett (Sverdrup) y su implicancia regional en la dorsal noroccidental de Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El Cañón Sloggett (Sverdrup) se encuentra sobre el talud continental, en el flanco sur de la Dorsal Norte de Scotia, a 10 km de península Mitre en la provincia de Tierra del Fuego. El cañón se halla sobre un margen continental pasivo-cizallado, en una región afectada por dos estructuras geológicas principales, las cuales corresponden al Sistema de Fallas Canal Beagle con dirección este-oeste y a los lineamientos noroeste-sureste (Lineamiento Sloggett). En este trabajo se presentan los resultados preliminares del cañón, a fin de realizar un estudio geomorfológico, y determinar su control estructural. Se utilizaron datos adquiridos durante la campaña YTEC-GTGM 0 realizada en el 2017 a bordo del buque oceanográfico Austral que consisten en a) batimetría con una sonda multihaz Kongsberg EM122 y monohaz con una sonda Kongsberg EA600 b) perfiles sísmicos de subfondo con la sonda Parasound P70 c) testigos de sedimento mediante el método de gravity core. El cañón tiene un área de aproximadamente 994 km2 y posee una longitud a lo largo de todo el eje de 101 km. En ambos flancos se visualizan canales tributarios donde se observa un mayor desarrollo en el flanco este. A la vez el eje del cañón posee abruptos cambios de dirección variando de N 125° a N 35°en dos ocasiones, coincidiendo con el Lineamiento Sloggett perteneciente a la ya extinta Dorsal Oeste de Scotia¸ lo que permite determinar un control tectónico en su desarrollo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".