Reflections on neoliberalism reloaded and the radical right: A dialogue with Lazzarato’s Capital Hates Everyone and Dardot, Laval, Guéguen and Sauvêtre’s The Choice of Civil War
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo busca conceptualizar el proceso de radicalización de las políticas neoliberales y su relación con el auge de movimientos y partidos políticos de ultraderecha. El trabajo comienza relevando distintos diagnósticos acerca de la crisis y el posible fin del neoliberalismo, para señalar que, lejos de poner en tela de juicio dicha racionalidad de gobierno, la crisis deviene un dispositivo de gobierno de las poblaciones que ha habilitado tanto el auge de las nuevas derechas como la puesta en cuestión de la democracia liberal en Occidente. Luego se abordan las lecturas realizadas por Lazzarato y Dardot, Laval, Guéguen y Sauvêtre respecto del carácter estratégico del neoliberalismo. En ese marco, mientras Lazzarato propone reconocer la existencia de un nuevo fascismo neoliberal, Dardot et al. refieren a una radicalización del propio neoliberalismo y de su autoritarismo intrínseco. Teniendo en cuenta estos aportes, se propone la noción de neoliberalismo recargado como un modo de caracterizar este nuevo neoliberalismo cuyas condiciones de posibilidad están dadas tanto por sus aspectos doctrinarios como por las mutaciones económicas, políticas y culturales en curso.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.060 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.026 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".