Eremochrysa (Eremochrysa) punctinervis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
E REMOCHRYSA (E REMOCHRYSA) PUNCTINERVIS (MacLachlan, 1869) Chrysopa punctinervis MacLachlan, 1869: 24. Lectotype: female; USA: Texas (Bosque County); subsequent designation and transfer to BMNH (Kimmins 1940: 449). Eremochrysa punctinervis (MacLachlan, 1869): Banks 1903: 159. Eremochrysa (Eremochrysa) punctinervis (MacLachlan, 1869): Brooks and Barnard 1990: 218, 272. SYNONYMY PERTAINING TO CANADA Eremochrysa punctinervis: Smith 1932: 583; Spencer 1942: 26; Garland 1982 [1984]: 115–120, 307–308, Figs. 15, 29– 35, Map 7; 1984: 94; 1985a: 737–751; Scudder 1994: 44. Eremochrysa (Eremochrysa) punctinervis: Penny et al. 1997: 54. 199. Holotype. MCZ No. 11379, Banks Collection. 200.All that remains of this record is a single forewing: Garland 1982 [1984]: 109. 201.Date of issue of parts of Vol. IV: No. 2 (pp.49–176), March 21, 1898. CANADA: T = 36 (3♂, 33♀). FIRST RECORD: BC: 1♀, Oliver, 23.v.1923 (C.B. Garrett) [CNC]. FLIGHT PERIOD: May 23 (1923; Oliver BC)–September 4 (1976; Penticton BC). BC: T = 36 (3♂, 33♀). FIRST RECORD: 1♀, Oliver, 23.v.1923 (C.B. Garrett) [CNC]. NEW RECORDS: 1♀, Osoyoos, Haynes E.R. [Ecological Reserve], 15.v.–17.vi.2001 (G.G.E. Scudder) / BGxh1 AN, recovery after fire, pitfall trap LR2-4 [SEM]. 1♀, Osoyoos, Desert Centre, 49°03'N 119°31'W, attracted to light, 28.viii.2003 (G.G.E. Scudder) [SEM]. FLIGHT PERIOD: May 23 (1923; Oliver)– September 4 (1976; Penticton). LOCALITIES: Oliver / Oliver, 1000 ft [305 m] [49°11'N 119°33'W; CNC]. Osoyoos, Haynes Ecological Reserve [49°02'N 119°27'W; SEM]. Osoyoos, Desert Centre, 49°03'N 119°31'W [SEM]. Penticton / Penticton, 2800– 3000 ft [853–914 m, vicinity of Carmi Road E of Penticton] [49°30'N 119°35'W; LEM]. Seton Lake, Lillooet [50°41'N 122°07'W; CNC]. South Okanagan [Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen, 49°25'N 120°00'W; CNC]. Eremochrysa punctinervis occurs in Canada, in British Columbia. All Canadian localities reported in literature have been authenticated. All specimens reported here are documented with data in Garland (1982 [1984]), or as new records (above). Based on label data, adults come to light. This is one of five species of Chrysopidae that have been designated as potentially rare and endangered in British Columbia (Scudder 1994).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".