Formulation d'un enrobé bitumineux coloré pour le Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most recent statistics released by the Quebec Ministry of Transportation attest that 26% of all traffic-related accidents occur within zones where speeds lie in the range of 50-60 km/hr. Lowering speeds in the aim of improving road safety has led to a new conception of road layouts at well as to the use of new materials, such as colored bituminous surfacing, which serve to both enhance the visibility of available space within the road environment and demarcate territories while creating urban backdrops. Given the advantages associated with this type of surfacing, including improved resistance to rutting, and the potential benefit of their use in Quebec (especially at city outskirts), a mix design study for colored bituminous overlays of the type ESG-10 for the province of Quebec has been conducted at the University Laboratory on Pavements, Roads and Bituminous Overlays (LUCREB) of the Ecole de Technologie Supérieure. The results obtained during the experimental program demonstrate that colored bituminous overlays in compliance with applicable standards can indeed be produced in Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".