MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7078246710 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16972722

Fig. 25 in Diversity in a greenhouse world: herpetofauna from the late Eocene (MP 17A) of La Bouffie, Quercy Phosphorites (Lot, SW France)

2025· other· en· W7078246710 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremaxillaMaxillaDorsumAnterior maxillaIncisorPosterior teeth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fig. 25 Squamata indet. from La Bouffie. a–c, Right dentary (UM-BFI 3093) in labial (a), lingual (b), and dorsal (c) views; d–e, left dentary (UM-BFI 3179) in lingual (d) and labial (e) views; f, left dentary (UM-BFI 3084) in lingual view; g–h, right dentary (UM-BFI 3071) in lingual (g) and labial (h) views; i–j, right dentary (UM-BFI 3062) in lingual (i) and labial (j) views; k–l, left lower jaw (UM-BFI 3205) in lingual (k) and labial (l) views; m–n, left maxilla (UM-BFI 3091) in lingual (m) and labial (n) views; o–q, right maxilla (UM-BFI 3092) in lingual (o), labial (p), and ventral (q) views; r, left maxilla (UM-BFI 3150) in lingual view; s–t, premaxilla (UM-BFI 3059) in posterior (s) and anterior (t) views; u–X, premaxilla (UM-BFI 3067) in anterior (u), posterior (v), left lateral (W), and dorsal (X) views; y–aa, premaxilla (UM-BFI 3086) in anterior (y), right lateral (z), and posterior (aa) views; ab–af, trunk vertebra (UM-BFI 3137) in dorsal (ab), ventral (ac), left lateral (ad), anterior (ae), and posterior (af) views

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→