FIGURE 7 in High local variability in elevation of the Oldman-Dinosaur Park Formation contact revealed by digital outcrop reconstruction, and implications for dinosaur biostratigraphy of the Late Cretaceous (Campanian) Belly River Group of Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIGURE 7. Measurement of architectural unit contacts within and beyond BB190 Amphitheatre area. A, measurement of Oldman-Dinosaur Park Formation (OF-DPF) contact elevation solely within a wide coulee forming northern margin of Amphitheatre area; elevation extracted from digital elevation model (DEM) generated during this study and 95% confidence interval of trend curves. B, comparison of OF-DPF contact elevations between aforementioned coulee and all contacts measured along Dinosaur Provincial Park (DPP) eastern right bank during DGPS survey in the early 2000s; elevation for both groups extracted from DEM generated during aerial Lidar survey of DPP. Mean contact elevations with standard errors are as follows: 658.64 ± 0.18 m (BB190 area), 659.46 ± 0.84 m (DPP East right bank). Vertical dashed lines indicate extent of region studied in Figure 7A; horizontal dotted line indicates ~0.05˚ average structural dip of DPP exposures to the northwest. C, comparison of architectural unit lower contacts across BB190 Amphitheatre area. Elevation extracted from DEM generated during this study, with 95% confidence interval of trend curves; vertical dashed lines indicate extent of region studied in Figure 7A; error bars omitted to improve point visibility; standard error provided with mean elevation for each contact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".