MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7078464595 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16985670

Anastatus gibsoni Rameshkumar, Ghosh & Sheela 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W7078464595 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedicelSimple eye in invertebratesSetaDorsumScape

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2. Anastatus gibsoni Rameshkumar, Ghosh & Sheela sp. nov. (Fig. 2) Material Examined: Holotype: 1♀, INDIA, Kerala, Palakkad, Parambikulam (10.4482°N, 76.7928°E), 27.xi.2018, Coll. Jafer Palot and party, deposited in National Zoological Collection, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Female: Holotype. Length 2.75 mm. Colouration: Head metallic green with coppery tinge on frons and gena; eyes gray; ocelli pale reflecting yellow; antenna with scape and F2 to F7 pale yellow, pedicel and F1 brown with greenish refringence, clava black; maxillary palpi brown, mandible pale yellow basally with apex dark brown; pronotum yellowish brown with spiracular part black; mesoscutum and SAC pale yellow; acropleuron yellowish brown, a little darker anteriorly, propodeum brown, prepectus subtriangular; legs and coxae yellow, mid tarsi with black pegs; metasoma with T 1 whitish yellow; T 2 to T 5 orange brown with apical parts darker, T 7 with golden yellow reflection. Distal two fifths of forewing uniformly infumate with dense setae, a single line of setae present near the margin of costal cell and other parts asetose. Head: In anterior view 1.2 × as wide as high, in dorsal view 1.2 × as wide as long, in lateral view 1.5 × as long as high, head width 3.5 × frontovertex width; MS 0.42 × EH in profile. Head sculpture reticulate. Frons with scattered punctures, IAA coarsely reticulate; scrobe deep, lateral margins carinate, separated from median ocellus by diameter of median ocellus, scrobal depression reticulate, median ocellus connected to scrobal depression by a weak groove. Frons, face, IAA, parascrobal area and gena with moderately dense white pubescence, lower face with comparatively denser pubescence. Vertex with dark setae. Antennal scape 8.4 × as long as wide and scape length 1.7 × of clava length. Mesosoma: Pronotum with distinct median groove, concave posteromedially. Mesoscutum with middle lobe distinctly longer than broad, 0.7 × length of mesoscutum in dorsal view, not convex, flat, distinctly reticulate, asetose; LLM smooth and shiny, with sharply raised dorsal margin on anterior and posterior halves, area between lateral lobes behind MLM depressed, smooth shiny, with pubescence; SAC reticulate, scutellum slightly convex with sparse black pubescence. Acropleuron finely and longitudinally striate-reticulate. Brachypterous, forewing 4.5 × as long as wide, extending a little beyond posterior margin of T1; hindwing 6.5 × as long as wide. Mid tibial spur equal to basitarsus, mid tarsus with single row of black pegs ventrally on either side on basal three tarsal segments; hind basitarsus (0.23 mm) a little shorter than following three segments combined (0.31 mm). Metasoma: A little longer (1.14: 1.19) than mesosoma, 5.2 × HT, T1 3.1 × as long as T2; T3 slightly longer than T2; T4 slightly longer and broader than T3; T5 a little narrower than and as long as T4. T6 and T7 narrower than T5. Ovipositor sheath not exserted. Etymology. The species Anastatus gibsoni is named after the renowned chalcidoid taxonomist, Dr. Gary A. P. Gibson from Biodiversity and Integrated Pest Management, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, for his continuous contribution to chalcidoid taxonomy. Male. Unknown. Measurements (mm): Head: H = 0.59, W = 0.71; OOL: POL: LOL = 0.02: 0.07: 0.07; relative measurements of L:W of antennal segments: Scape = 0.41: 0.05, pedicel = 0.08: 0.05, anellus = 0.03: 0.04, F1 = 0.10: 0.04, F2 = 0.07: 0.05, F3 = 0.08: 0.06, F4 = 0.09: 0.07; F5 = 0.08: 0.07, F6 = 0.08: 0.08, F7 = 0.07: 0.08, clava = 0.23: 0.09; forewing: L = 0.80, W = 0.18; hind wing: L = 0.4, W = 0.06; HT = 0.83; length of metasomal segments: T1 = 0.31, T2 = 0.1, T3 = 0.14. Comments: Anastatus gibsoni also closely resembles A. rufopostumus Narendran. The differences include the scape and F2 to F7 of the antenna being pale yellow, while F1 and pedicel are brown with a greenish refringence, and the clava is black. The distal one-fourth of the forewing is uniformly infumate without a pale yellowish area medially. The colour of the SAC is pale yellow, the legs are uniformly yellow, and the ovipositor sheath is not exserted. A. rufopostumus has dark brown antennae with only the scape pale yellowish-brown, the distal infumate part of the forewing with a lighter yellowish area medially, an SAC dark brown, legs dark brown with fore and mid coxae lighter brown, mid tarsus pale yellow, and an exserted ovipositor sheath. Anastatus gibsoni can easily be distinguished from A. narendrani in having antenna with F2 to F7 pale yellow, F1 and pedicel brown with green refringence, clava black; scrobal depression deeply carinate and separated from front ocellus by the diameter of front ocellus, connected to ocellus with a groove; around two fifth of the distal part of forewing infumate; narrower wings and shorter legs; no triangular flattening of distal segment of maxillary palp. The latter has antenna yellowish brown, only scape darker and gradually lighter towards apex and apical segment of clava brown; a non carinate scrobe separated from front ocellus by four times the diameter of front ocellus and without a groove; around one third of the distal part of forewing infumate and last segment of maxillary palp broadened and flattened into triangular shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→