MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7078735279 · doi:10.5683/sp3/zcvxlx

Turning Strategies while Walking on an Omnidirectional Treadmill with Virtual Reality

2025· dataset· en· W7078735279 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtual realityOmnidirectional antennaTreadmillGaitPreferred walking speedTask (project management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains outcomes from a walking and turning task conducted under three conditions: (1) overground walking (OVG), (2) walking on an omnidirectional treadmill without virtual reality (ODT), and (3) walking on an omnidirectional treadmill with virtual reality (ODTVR). Participants performed 45° and 90° turns, allowing for the analysis of body segment reorientation and spatiotemporal outcomes. The dataset supports direct comparisons of locomotor strategies across conditions. - Dataset 01 sample characteristics; - Dataset 02 onsets of body segment reorientation; - Dataset 03 amplitudes of body segment reorientation; - Dataset 04 spatiotemporal gait outcomes for turning trials; - Dataset 05 walking speed during straight walking trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisSame topicCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisFrench-language works237,207