Estudios sobre liderazgo en el sureste de México. Aspectos por mejorar en la formación de los directores de escuela. [Studies on Leadership in Southeast Mexico].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Título original: Estudios sobre liderazgo en el sureste de México. Aspectos por mejorar en la formación de los directores de escuela. D.R. © 2021 Edith J. Cisneros-CohernourD.R. © Universidad Autónoma de YucatánD.R. © Secretaría de Educación Pública Esta obra fue sometida a un riguroso proceso de evaluación doble ciegopor académicos especialistas en el tema. Comité de evaluación:Dra. Maricela López Ornelas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaDr. Patricio Henríquez Ritchie, Universidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaDra. Judith Galarza López, Universidad de La Habana, Red-ES Eugenia Montalván Proyectos Culturales S.C.P.unas letras industria editorialCalle 64 No. 560 x 73 y 71Centro Histórico97000Mérida, Yucatán, Méxicoeditoraunasletras@gmail.com Foto de portada: © Michele Moreno ISBN: 978-607-9054-84-7 Fecha de publicación: agosto, 2021
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".