Bibliographic record
Abstract
The film Enemy, directed by the Franco-Canadian Denis Villeneuve, is one of the many examples cinema offers of the figure of the double. Among the notable works that address this theme, we can mention The Student of Prague (1913) by Stellan Rye, Vertigo (1958) by Alfred Hitchcock, or The Double Life of Veronique (1991) by Krzysztof Kieslowski. The protagonist of Enemy is a very particular case of the figure of the double as he is a split character who constantly hovers between the ambiguity of being a physical or a psychic entity. In addition, the fragmentation of the narrative line, the omission of information, and the strong symbolic load of many elements require the viewer to organize the events and interpret them. In this context, the present study aims to offer an exegesis of the film through the analysis of its narrative structure, the use of symbols, and the confi-guration of its protagonist, based on the studies of Juan Herrero Cecilia on the myth of the double, as well as some of the postulates of Jung, Freud, and Marcuse regarding the unconscious and identity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.089 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".