MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079454785 · doi:10.26108/pvks-tc08

Petrography, geochemistry, and PB-ZN-CU-AS-AU mineralization in drill core from the Faribault Brook area, western Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia

2020· article· en· W7079454785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrographyLithologyClastic rockMineralization (soil science)MaficQuartzArsenopyriteSedimentary rockProterozoic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mineral exploration has been done in the Faribault Brook area of the western Cape Breton Highlands, Nova Scotia, since the 1890s, but the age, structure, and tectonic setting of both the mineralization and its highly deformed metavolcanic and metasedimentary host rocks remain enigmatic. This study focuses on core from three exploration holes drilled in 1978, 1990, and 2008 and archived at the NS Department of Energy and Mines core library (Stellarton). Visual core logging combined with magnetic susceptibility measurements, petrographic study, and chemical analyses enabled identification of lithology in these mainly fine-grained, deformed and metamorphosed rocks. Hole AMC-06-79 (177.3 m) from near the Core Shack occurrence north of Faribault Brook consists of interlayered mafic metavolcanic, calc-silicate and garnet-rich metasedimentary rocks; the abundance of metavolcanic rocks increases with depth and metasandstone with blue detrital quartz clasts occurs at the top of the hole. Hole RB-90-01 (102.4 m) from near the Rocky Brook occurrence 7 km south of Faribault Brook also contains interlayered metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks but metasedimentary units dominate in the upper and lower sections. Hole GM-09-08 (50 m) from the western part of the area consists of metasandstone with blue quartz clasts and interbedded siltstone. All 3 holes contain more mineralization than recognized in company assessment reports. Elevated Pb-Zn occur mainly as stratabound layers in metasedimentary rocks whereas Cu and As are hosted in quartz-carbonate veins. Anomalous Au was found in two holes in both quartz veins with arsenopyrite (up to 6 ppm Au) and in metawacke with elevated Pb and Zn (e.g. 1236 ppb Au, 2465 ppm Pb, and 6086 ppm Zn). Although mineralization in the Faribault Brook area was previously assumed to be VMS-style, most mineralization in the three drill holes is in metasedimentary rocks, suggesting sedimentary exhalative (SedEx)-type with related epithermal veins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207