MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079460743 · doi:10.26108/g1b3-4x07

Resource partitioning and repeatability in foraging behaviours among four auks nesting in sympatry in a sub-Arctic ecosystem

2016· article· en· W7079460743 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdForagingInterspecific competitionUria aalgeTrophic levelPredationPelagic zoneNiche segregationSympatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHAPTER 2: Abstract. Auks, a group of diving seabirds, share ecological similarities, and are often found in sympatrically-nesting assemblages at suitable nesting sites. Despite these similarities, it is expected that co-existing species have evolved strategies that reduce niche overlap in response to resource competition. The presence of Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica), razorbills (Alca torda), thick-billed (Uria lomvia) and common murres (Uria aalge) at the Gannet Islands, Labrador, is an opportunity to study interspecific interactions among the four main and similar species of a seabird assemblage. I compared the foraging movement of adult birds, and chick and adult diet inferred from stable isotopes, as dimensions in the foraging niche among these four auks. My results revealed that puffins and thick-billed murres headed offshore to forage, while razorbills and common murres were more coastal heading towards mainland Labrador. The patterns of spatial segregation found among the coastal and the pelagic birds were mirrored by their stable isotope ratios, with a group of species foraging on a higher trophic level of an inshore food web, and the other foraging on a lower trophic level of an offshore and pelagic food web. The 'pelagic' species segregated on prey choice for the chick while differential alternate prey selection was the source of segregation between the 'coastal' species. My 17 findings are more evidence that segregation, in at least one or more dimensions of the foraging niche, is a key mechanism that potentially reduces interspecific competition among co-existing and closely related seabirds, explaining the persistence of such seabird assemblages through time. Chapter 3: Abstract. In animal populations, there are individuals that are highly consistent while others are highly flexible in their behavioural strategy. Since seabirds forage in an environment regulated by bottom-up mechanisms, their foraging behaviour is expected to be more plastic in response to changing environmental conditions that might affect the distribution of their preferred prey. I was interested in looking at how short-term individual consistency in different foraging behaviours varies across species of an important seabird assemblage nesting in sympatry: Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica), razorbills (Alca torda), common murres (Uria aalge) and thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia). I looked at the repeatability in foraging effort (maximum distance and duration) as well as in foraging locations of individual foraging trips to assess the various levels of individual consistency for those given behaviours. Observed individual repeatability for all behaviours varied considerably by species. Puffins proved to be highly flexible, contrasting with razorbills that were highly consistent, while a range of individual consistencies were revealed in thick-billed murres and to a lesser extent in common murres. These interspecific differences were likely promoted by differences in specific optimal prey availability and perhaps were reflecting individual strategies such as specialization for particular prey items. Because there is a need to better understand 57 individual foraging decisions and how consistency in behaviour influences or is influenced by an individual's intrinsic characteristics, I related individual consistency with individual physiological and body condition in thick-billed murres. I found strong correlations both positive and negative between individual-level repeatability indices and individual intrinsic components suggesting that individual consistency in foraging effort and flexibility in foraging location are intrinsically linked to individual capacities and constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207