Occupational stress and clergy support within the United Baptist Convention of the Atlantic Provinces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis project addresses the issues of clergy occupational stress and support within the United Baptist Convention of the Atlantic Provinces. The primary areas of investigation are: stress, self-care, local church care, and denominational support services. In addressing these areas a practical theology of clergy care/support for the United Baptist Convention of the Atlantic Provinces is considered. Selected Old and New Testament characters are examined, as their calling and career suggest a model for modern clergy, churches and denominations. A review of the literature considers the clergyperson, his call, role, personal concerns, family, conflict, denominational support services, and the Canadian perspective on clergy care/support. In addition a research investigation was undertaken involving two representative associations (72 clergy, with a response of 66, (88%)), within the United Baptist Convention of the Atlantic Provinces, the two Area ministers responsible for these associations and the Executive minister of the denomination. Practical insight in the life and ministry of clergy within the United Baptist Convention of the Atlantic Provinces was gained, with the results of the research project indicating that occupational stress, coping and support issues are of considerable concern to the clergy of this denomination. Recommendations have been made for the denomination, clergy, seminary, and churches to consider in developing support and care for clergy within the context of their ministry identity in this denomination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".