MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079521456 · doi:10.26108/3gf9-wv97

Cultivating class consciousness in Canadian short fiction from the 1930s

2010· article· en· W7079521456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyOpposition (politics)Class consciousnessPoliticsConsciousnessDominant ideologyRepresentation (politics)CapitalismImprisonment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the economic turbulence of the Depression, many authors began to focus on economic issues in order to promote a radical opposition to the capitalist establishment. Through an examination of a selection of short stories that were published in Canadian literary magazines during the Depression, this thesis examines the complex relationship between literature and ideology. By examining these texts from a socialist perspective, this thesis determines the role of literature in developing class consciousness and promoting social reform. This thesis discusses three spheres of political engagement of capitalist society in this fiction: the representation of the workplace, the representation of the infiltration of ideology into the consciousness of the working class, and the representation of the bourgeoisie. By examining these three strata of capitalist society this thesis interrogates the infiltration of capitalist ideology into individual consciousness. While many of the characters are imprisoned within capitalist institutions, these stories compel readers to recognize this imprisonment as a construction of ideology and thus challenge the ideological strictures at work in their own lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207