Report of the Annual Meeting between ICES, Advisory Councils and other Observers (MIACO)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report presents a comprehensive overview of the 2025 meeting between ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) and Advisory Councils and other observers (MIACO). It covers the advisory outputs produced in 2024, quality assurance initiatives, future directions for fishing opportunities advice, ecosystem service and effects advice, stakeholder engagement, and planning for 2025. The meeting aimed to review current practices, discuss challenges, and gather stakeholder feedback to improve ICES advisory processes.ICES produced a record 251 advisory documents in 2024, covering fishing opportunities for 192 stocks with an estimated catch of 5.2 million tonnes in the North Atlantic. Advice also included special requests on management plans, marine strategy directives, and ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ecosystem services advice encompassed Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs), bycatch of endangered and protected species, and spatial trade-offs related to benthic impacts. New developments included workshops on offshore wind energy and the publication of the Framework for Ecosystem-Informed Science and Advice (FEISA) and a roadmap for marine recreational fisheries. Quality assurance efforts focused on the Transparent Assessment Framework (TAF) and data management improvements, including clearer data calls and enhanced diagnostics to increase reproducibility and transparency of advice.The ICES Action Plan to Address Quality Assurance was detailed, highlighting coordinated sampling programs, data governance, and the benchmark process as key quality control elements. The plan emphasizes accountability, transparency, and continuous improvement through audits, diagnostics, and training. Challenges such as complex model errors and software version inconsistencies were noted, with a transition to TAF expected to reduce such issues. Ten prioritized actions for 2025 include adherence to deadlines, improved benchmark planning, independent audits, standardized diagnostics, and automation of outputs.Discussions on rebuilding strategies and reference points highlighted ongoing work by ICES workshops and the MIRIA subgroup. While rebuilding scenarios are under development, implementation in 2025 advice was considered premature. The separation of operational reference points from stock status reference points is proposed to improve clarity. Stakeholders expressed diverse views on mixed stock guidelines, emphasizing the need for clarity, consistency, and communication of risks to managers. Concerns about economic impacts and the practicality of zero catch advice in mixed fisheries were raised, with calls for more adaptive and pragmatic approaches. ICES reaffirmed its role in providing precautionary advice while maintaining independence and engaging stakeholders through open workshops.The Framework for Ecosystem-Informed Science and Advice (FEISA) was introduced as a tool to support ecosystem-based management by integrating indicators, risk assessment, and operational objectives aligned with management goals. FEISA facilitates translation of scientific knowledge into actionable advice, emphasizing risk communication and incremental development from contextual to objective-based assessments. The approach aims to connect diverse ecosystem considerations with fisheries advice while allowing for tailored management strategies.Planning for next-generation Ecosystem Overviews (EOs) will focus on enhancing relevance and usability by integrating overviews with fishing opportunities advice. Feedback highlighted the importance of actionable management objectives by ecoregion and the potential role of overviews in advancing ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). The interaction between descriptive and strategic advice remains a topic for development.Progress on the ICES Offshore Renewable Energy roadmap includes reports and workshops addressing socioeconomic impacts on fisheries, cumulative impact assessments, and ecosystem effects of ORE developments. The advice will focuses on scientific assessment rather than management actions, considering both negative and positive ecological impacts, including artificial habitats and species introductions. The scope primarily covers bottom-fixed and floating wind systems, with attention to lifecycle phases from construction to decommissioning.ICES activities supporting the Kunming-Montreal Framework and EU Nature Restoration Regulation include the planned Workshop on Nature Restoration (WKREST) aimed at defining restoration types, recovery timeframes, and monitoring capacities. The workshop will involve experts across fisheries, habitat mapping, and marine spatial planning. WKREST is positioned as a scientific exercise to build advisory capacity aligned with policy drivers and international frameworks.The new ICES stakeholder webpage was launched to improve transparency and showcase stakeholder roles in ICES processes. The Stakeholder Engagement Strategy, developed since 1980 and formalized in 2023, aims to build a diverse and competent stakeholder pool, enable effective contributions, and maintain traceable engagement processes. The Working Group on Stakeholder Engagement (WGENGAGE) will launch in March 2025 to support implementation of the strategy. The revised Observer Rules, revised in 2025, clarify observer types and access, balancing openness with the need to maintain impartiality in advice. Stakeholders expressed appreciation for the openness but noted challenges in participation in certain closed groups, emphasizing the need for balanced and timely engagement.The 2025 work plan aligns expert group meetings and advice requester deadlines to optimize advice production and quality control. New tools, such as PowerBI and SharePoint, will enhance advice process visibility. The meeting concluded with a summary of discussions and action points emphasizing quality assurance, stakeholder engagement, ecosystem-based approaches, and pragmatic advice frameworks. Participants valued the hybrid meeting format and highlighted the importance of transparency, balanced stakeholder input, and improved communication of scientific debates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it