MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079672164 · doi:10.26108/7rv5-sn27

The effect of short-duration rainfall on the surface water quality of Thomas Brook, Kings County, Nova Scotia

2011· article· en· W7079672164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNutrientSurface runoffWater qualityThroughflowHydrology (agriculture)PhosphorusPrecipitationSurface waterEutrophication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface water quality of freshwater systems is an indicator of the overall health of an ecosystem. Nitrogen and phosphorus are limiting nutrients in freshwater systems, so slight increases in either nutrient can negatively affect surface water quality. Agricultural practices dominate approximately 50% of the Thomas Brook watershed, which is located in the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia, so nitrogen and phosphorus are used as fertilizers in high amounts during the growing season. This research project focuses on the movement of nutrients from agricultural land into the watercourse during periods of precipitation and their effect on the health of the watershed. An analysis of the surface water quality of Thomas Brook during three periods of moderate to heavy rainfall, estimated to exceed 20 millimetres, in the spring of 2011 determined the increase in nutrient concentrations as a result of excess water and sediment input from overland flow and throughflow. Results from this study show that the nutrient pathway from land surfaces into local surface water during rainfall events differs depending on the nutrient fraction and is a function of the slope of the landscape, duration of precipitation, and/or grain size of the till within the watershed. Major findings indicate that total phosphorus migration is correlated with sediment movement due to overland flow. Nitrate migration into Thomas Brook occurs as a result of throughflow and this fraction only entered the watercourse during periods of long-duration precipitation. The pathway of migration of these nutrients may aid in verifying the efficacy of beneficial management practices that have been implemented within the Thomas Brook watershed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207