The perceived benefits and barriers for baby boomers volunteering in hospital settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is an initial attempt to investigate the relationship of the benefits and barriers for baby boomers volunteering in hospital settings, and the link to various aspects of wellness. Baby boomers are a large demographic in Canada, bringing their role in the volunteer sector to light as more set to retire. As retirement for this generation has already begun, and more is soon to follow, hospitals in Canada will be forced to structure programs in a way that caters to this demographic. The subjects of this study were selected because they were baby boomers at one of two large, suburban hospitals in Ontario's Greater Toronto Area. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured format, which allowed the participants to share their stories and experiences. The interviews were recorded on audiotape and transcribed. The stories of participants demonstrated a connection between the positive work they were doing, and their personal mental health/wellness, a spiritual meaning to their work, as well as the values of social capital. The results did not support extensive findings for participation barriers; as only current volunteers were those interviewed. Key findings were that volunteering is a benefit for four distinct areas of wellness; physical, social, psychological, and spiritual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".