MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079712332 · doi:10.26108/0d28-hw64

Building the kingdom of God one funeral at a time: The strategic importance of the funeral address for creating links between church and community and winning new converts

2014· article· en· W7079712332 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKingdomFuneral RitesRelevance (law)NeglectState (computer science)Institution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J. Peter Holmes has written an outstanding thesis entitled, Towards A Methodology for Preaching at Funerals. Holmes identifies a major trend in his home province of Ontario where fewer people opt for religious funeral services when a loved one dies. Those who choose to have a type of service rarely prefer the traditional service, in favor of the growing trend of a ―celebration of life‖ service. Unlike Ontario where mourners turn less and less to the church for funerals, Atlantic Canadians still look to the church more than any other institution for funeral rites presenting an important opportunity for the church. Chapter one begins by examining the current state of affairs between the church and the world regarding funeral addresses. In general terms, the church today is in search of relevance on numerous issues including the administering of funeral rites. Using the qualitative research method, chapter two faces the serious ―What do bereaved families want in a funeral address?‖ This is an important question and it is be addressed carefully making use of a research questionnaire circulated among former parishioners of the writer. This research will seek to capture reactions to a specific type of funeral address from parishioners who heard the writer speak at funerals. The complete set of questions and answers comprise Appendix Two. Chapter three is a literature review which surveys some of the major textbooks on preaching to highlight the neglect of the funeral addresses. Situations of death and reaction to them in the Bible make up chapter four. The fifth chapter moves the study towards a theology of funeral addresses. The chapter examines the tension faced by ministers regarding how to include adequate biographical material while upholding vii biblical truth in a funeral address. The chapter suggests a roadmap which includes a way to decipher faith, or lack thereof, in the lives of the bereaved. Issues of methodology are tackled in chapter six. The goal is to provide assistance to all ministers seeking to accomplish the important task of telling a life story of the departed one in a truthful and delightful way. Chapter seven rounds up the study with a focus on the thesis title. It is a way to wind down the thesis study keeping in mind the original goal. It ties together various components of the thesis showing how building the kingdom of God is accomplished. Chapter eight concludes the research with chapter summaries. The project component of the thesis is a research tool for information gathering by ministers to allow for an accurate exegesis of life. This will facilitate an authentic life story to emerge. The research will seek to note whether any other preachers in Atlantic Canada are going in this direction. Appendices consist of the consent form, questionnaire and responses, the biographical inquiry form, a sermon excerpt from a homiletical giant of another era and examples of funeral addresses created in the fashion suggested by the thesis. The bibliography will carry titles of books and articles cited as well as non-cited ones. While the work of Peter Holmes provided the springboard for this thesis, there is a point of departure in the suggested solution. Holmes puts forward The Four Pages of The Sermon by Paul Scott Wilson as the key for effective preaching at funerals. This thesis proposes telling the story of the departed as the solution to the preaching challenge at funerals. This option removes the dilemma since there is a story to tell from each life. The thesis will argue that celebrating the life created is an act of faith and worship of the creator. viii Unless otherwise indicated, Bible quotations will be taken from the New International Version.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207