MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7079888174 · doi:10.26108/jbxf-pw52

Resisting erosion in a sea of capitalism: two case studies of anti-capitalist worker cooperatives in Canada

2008· article· en· W7079888174 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisCollectivismPoliticsDialecticProcess (computing)Social change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is an exploration of the dialectical orientation of two worker cooperatives in Canada: Mondragon Coffeehouse in Winnipeg and The Sleepless Goat in Kingston. It explores the contradictions these two organizations must navigate within a pro-bureaucratic capitalist environment and how these contradictions have contributed to their development and, more specifically the development of the individual members. The analysis is based on the key theoretical concepts of worker cooperatives, democratic-collectivist organizations, revolutionary praxis, and solidarity. Beginning from the experience of individual cooperative members, this thesis makes the connection between the alternative organization's structural development and the self-changing of the individual. This reinforced Karl Marx's notion of revolutionary praxis which suggests a correlation between the changing of circumstances and individual change. Based on a comparative analysis between two worker cooperatives, using twelve in-depth, semi-structured interviews the research revealed a number of key findings. The main finding was that despite beginning with similar structure and intent over a decade or so these two organizations developed in largely different directions. While Mondragon was able to maintain its political commitments and democratic-collectivist structure, The Sleepless Goat became more concerned with business practice and in the process allowed its political commitments and collectivist structure to fade. It was found that cross-movement solidarity, recruitment practice, and effective communication of goals and practices were all contributing factors in the maintenance or erosion of social movement goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207