PENGARUH RELIGIUSITAS TERHADAP PENERIMAAN DIRI INDIVIDU PADA PERIODE QUARTER LIFE CRISIS: IMPLEMENTASI DALAM KONSELING ISLAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is a critical phase often marked by identity confusion and social pressure, which can reduce individuals’ self-acceptance. Religiosity, particularly knowledge and practice of religious values, has the potential to be a source of strength in facing these challenges. Islamic counseling, as a holistic approach integrating psychological and spiritual aspects based on the Qur’an and Sunnah, can help individuals organize positive thinking patterns and behaviors to enhance self-acceptance. This study aims to examine the influence of religiosity on self-acceptance among individuals in the quarter life crisis period. This study used a quantitative method with 267 respondents, analyzed through simple linear regression using SPSS. The results show that religiosity has a positive and significant effect on self-acceptance, with an R value of 0.513 and an R² value of 0.263. The knowledge and practice indicators are the dominant factors in this influence. These findings reinforce the importance of the Islamic counseling approach in supporting self-acceptance during the quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".