Heritage Assessment The Ostrich Inn, Newland, GL16 8NP United Kingdom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RDA was commissioned to undertake a HERITAGE ASSESSMENT and BUILDING RECORDING LEVEL 2 of the Ostrich Inn a GDII listed building. This report included commissioning an HER search from Gloucester Archaeology ; And includes : A Brief Historical Background of Newland Village; Setting and Vistas, History of the site; The Ostrich Inn, including archive research; Map Regression exercise; Collating the information and transcribing any Deeds; Planning history; an equivalent of a Level 2 Building Recording Survey on site of Cellar, GF spaces and FF bedrooms, Roof [where accessible] [Ref Historic England Guidance A Guide to Good Recording Practice Published 24 May 2016] Written Building Descriptions and Analysis with RDA Photographs are in this report using provided plans 'as existing' provided by client ; Phasing where possible of the different architectural periods; External and Interior Analysis; Traffic light of architectural significance of all areas and rooms; Low/ Medium/ High, Assessment of Significance-Historical Value; Evidential/Architectural Value; Setting/Group Value; Community Value, and a Statement of Significance; Conclusion and Conservation Advice. Enabled a listed building application to be submitted and subsequently approved
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.213 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".