MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7081166210 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17092448

Chillcottomyia ovaticornis Sinclair, Andrade & Gonçalves, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W7081166210 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSimple eye in invertebratesHolotypeScapeDorsumPedicelOvipositor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chillcottomyia ovaticornis sp. nov. Figs 2, 3–7, 8–10 Type material. Holotype • ♂; “ Portugal: Porto, Valongo / 41°09'33.4"N, 8°29'05.6"W / 30.viii.2018, R. Andrade leg. / CNC 2175714 ”; “ HOLOTYPE / Chillcottomyia ovaticornis / Sinclair, Andrade & / Gonçalves [red label] ” (CNC). Paratype: Portugal • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; Jul. 13 2023; CNC 2175715. Etymology. The species name is derived from the Latin ovatus (egg-shaped) and cornu (horn), in reference to the ovate-shaped postpedicel. Diagnosis. This small species is distinguished from all other species of the genus, except an un-named species from Morocco by the ovate-shaped postpedicel. The male terminalia is similar to the type species, characterized by left epandrial lamella with subapical dorsal row of stout, stiff setae; right epandrial lamella with outer row of long, stiff setae and inner row of shorter, stout, stiff setae. Male with single, very long anterodorsal seta on mid tibia, female with pair of anterodorsal setae. Description. Wing length 3.0– 3.5 mm. Male. Eyes orange-brown, not flattened dorsally (Fig. 3, as in Fig. 5); upper facets paler and twice as large as darker lower facets, separated by line (Figs 5, 6). Occiput dark brown with grey pruinescence; occipital setae pale. Ocellar triangle elevated, pruinescent, bearing pair of long ocellar setae; distance between posterior ocelli subequal to width of ocellus. Antenna with scape and pedicel brown; postpedicel brown, ovate (as in Fig. 5), slightly projecting dorsally, 2 × as long as basal width; arista-like stylus dark, more than 3 × longer than postpedicel. Proboscis and palpus dark brown. Scutum strongly arched, dark brown, with pruinescence divided by 4 shiny vittae separating broad central pruinescent band along acrostichals from narrower pruinescent band along dorsocentrals and outer shiny vitta on outer margin of dorsocentral band (as in Fig. 6); postpronotum and postalar callus pale brown; pleura uniformly brown with pruinescence. Chaetotaxy: acrostichals in two biserial rows, thin and short; dorsocentrals uniserial with 1 very long, strong prescutellar dorsocentral seta, shorter than apical scutellum; postpronotum with several long setulae; 1 notopleural seta; 1 postalar seta; 6–7 pairs of scutellar setae, apical pair longest. Legs yellowish brown, including coxae; tarsomeres 3–5 brown (Fig. 3). Fore femur with anteroventral and posteroventral row of slender setae, latter row longer. Fore tibia broader than mid tibia, with 1 preapical anterodorsal seta, length twice width of tibia and similar posteroventral seta; numerous long, erect slightly shorter dorsal setae; posterior face of long fine setae, subequal to width of tibia; apical third of anterior face with matted setulae. Fore tarsomere slender; tarsomere 1 with dense ventral setae, nearly as long as width of tarsomere. Mid femur with anteroventral and posteroventral row of slender setae, shorter than width of femur. Mid tibia straight; 1 anterodorsal seta on basal half, one-third length of tibia; apex with circlet of long, slender setae, including pair of ventral setae; anterior face with strong setae. Mid tarsus similar to fore tarsus. Hind femur with long posterior and posterodorsal setae on basal half, longer than width of femur; apical half with long anteroventral setae, twice as long as width of femur; apex with circlet of long, slender preapical setae. Hind tibia slightly clavate; 1 long anterodorsal seta on basal half; numerous, long anterodorsal, posterodorsal and anteroventral setae; apex with long anterodorsal and posterodorsal preapical setae; apical third with dense brush of posterior setae. Hind tarsomere 1 slightly broader than remaining tarsomeres; with dense brush of posterior setae, similar to apical third of tibia. Hind tarsomeres 2 and 3 with posterior brush of setae similar to tarsomere 1. Wing slightly infuscate; pterostigma dark brown, oval; vein R 2 + 3 slightly arched beneath pterostigma; cell dm only slightly broader apically, crossvein dm - m 1.5 × as long as length of apical section of M 4. Halter pale brown. Abdomen brown, subshiny, clothed in slender pale setae (Fig. 7); tergite 6 without denser and stouter lateral setae; tergite 7 with left lateral setae more than twice as long as right lateral setae; sternites 7–8 with left lateral setae longer than right lateral setae; tergite 8 asymmetrical, divided into two separated sclerites: subtriangular sclerite, tapered to left, produced into slender, sclerotized projection and small triangular sclerite beneath projection, with 2 slender posterior setae; sternite 8 asymmetrical, broadly rectangular, left margin tapered to smaller sclerite of tergite 8. Terminalia (Figs 8–10): Epandrium asymmetrical, left lamella longer and slenderer than shorter and rounded right lamella; right surstylus delimited along inner margin of lamella. Apex of left epandrial lamella arched dorsally with 3 arched, thickened subapical setae (Fig. 8); inner margin with row of some 10 thickened, stiff setae, slightly longer than width of lamella. Right epandrial lamella triangular inflated laterally with surstylus differentiated along inner margin (Fig. 9); outer face with row of 6 thickened setae, longer than width of lamella, and longer than similar setae on inner surstylus. Right surstylus subtriangular with apical row of some 8 thickened setae and clustered row of 6 longer thickened setae. Hypandrium asymmetrical (Fig. 10); posterior margin deeply bilobate, with right lobe longer than left lobe; each lobe with sharp inner ridge extending to apex; right lobe triangular, with line of 3 strong setae and 1 weaker, thin seta; left lobe rounded apically with line of 4 setae. Postgonite flange-like, flattened along inner face with row of subapical setulae. Phallus with pair of ventrally directed hooked processes. Cerci symmetrical, simple, pilose with slender setae; apex without cluster of setae. Hypoproct with pair of short, subapical setae, continuous with slender, elongate subepandrial sclerite. Female. Similar to male in size (Figs 4–6); leg chaetotaxy longer and denser; pair of very long anterodorsal setae on mid tibia. Distribution. This species was collected near the village of Couce (Valongo), in northern Portugal. The female was collected by sweeping vegetation along a small trickle of water near a small river (Ferreira River) (Fig. 2). The surrounding slopes are predominantly covered with eucalyptus stands, while the riverbanks feature patches of native trees, including oaks (Quercus orocantabrica and Quercus suber), willows (mainly Salix atrocinerea), ash trees (Fraxinus angustifolia), and others. Remarks. An undescribed species from Morocco (Zouhair and Kettani 2022) is likely conspecific based on the ovate-shaped postpedicel. All other known species of Chillcottomyia are characterized by a conical-shaped postpedicel. The arista-like stylus is supra-terminal in the Portugal specimens but is stated as terminal in Zouhair and Kettani (2022). Confirmation of the identity of the Moroccan species must await discovery of male specimens and comparison of the male terminalia. The row of thickened setae on the left epandrial lamella is very similar to C. septentrionalis Saigusa (see Saigusa 1986, fig. 2), which characterizes a species group within this genus (Sinclair unpubl. data). The shape of the postpedicel is rather similar to the genus Ocydromia Meigen, but as stated in the key to genera of Afrotropical Hybotidae (Sinclair and Cumming 2017), the wing clearly distinguishes the two genera: pterostigma rounded and dark (elongate and faint in Ocydromia), crossvein dm - m straight (curved in Ocydromia) and R 2 + 3 arched below pterostigma (vein straight in Ocydromia).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→