MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7081429484

Recherche de biomarqueurs précoces du développement de la dermatite atopique chez des chiens de races prédisposées

2025· dissertation· en· W7081429484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransepidermal water lossAtopic dermatitisAtopyCohortLabrador RetrieverSkin lesion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atopic dermatitis, an inflammatory, pruritic, and chronic dermatosis, affects both dogs and humans. It is caused by a defect in the skin barrier and leads to eczema lesions that worsen over time. Early management is crucial for effective treatment.In this context, early diagnosis is particularly valuable. In humans, it has been shown that skin hydration levels and transepidermal water loss at the age of three months are predictive of eczema lesions at six months of age.Certain dog breeds are predisposed to the disease, including the Golden Retriever and the Labrador Retriever, which are both widely represented in the canine population, particularly among assistance dogs.The BIOMAD study is a longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of dogs from the Handi’chiens association and dogs owned by veterinary students. This pilot study allows the monitoring of three skin biomarkers in healthy dogs: pH, hydration level, and transepidermal water loss. Additionally, differences in these values are being investigated by comparing healthy dogs with those suspected of having atopic dermatitis. So far, no significant difference has been identified, mainly due to the very small number of suspected cases, but the continuation of the project will allow the recruitment of more subjects to pursue this objective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→