MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081575506 · doi:10.20383/103.01100

A long-term water quality and meteorological data set (2014 – 2021) of a eutrophic prairie lake: Buffalo Pound Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada

2025· dataset· en· W7081575506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFederated Research Data Repository · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyWind speedWater qualityColored dissolved organic matterPhotosynthetically active radiationEutrophicationSeasonalitySampling (signal processing)Chlorophyll a

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lakes can undergo rapid changes that are not captured during traditional, discrete sampling campaigns. Sensor-based data provided opportunities to understand these rapid changes in lakes. Here, we present 8 years of sensor-based monitoring data from the open water season in a shallow, polymictic reservoir in southern Saskatchewan, which serves as an important drinking water supply. A monitoring buoy was moored at a single location, providing sensor data, including water temperature, photosynthetically available radiation (PAR), pH, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, turbidity, phycocyanin and chlorophyll at 2 depths (0.8 and 2.8 m below surface), and temperature throughout the water column, at 10-minute intervals timeframe. The buoy also had a weather station, recording air temperature, barometric pressure, PAR, rain, relative humidity, wind direction and wind speed. Data were reviewed and graded for data quality. This long-term dataset can be used to understand thermal variation and varied, often rapid, changes that polymictic lakes undergo, particularly through seasonal changes and development of cyanobacterial blooms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederated Research Data RepositorySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207