A Simplified Reduction for Error Correcting Matrix Multiplication Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the problem of transforming an algorithm for matrix multiplication, whose output has a small fraction of the entries correct into a matrix multiplication algorithm, whose output is fully correct for all inputs. In this work, we provide a new and simple way to transform an average-case algorithm that takes two matrices A,B ∈ 𝔽_p^{n×n} for a prime p, and outputs a matrix that agrees with the matrix product AB on a 1/p + ε fraction of entries on average for a small ε > 0, into a worst-case algorithm that correctly computes the matrix product for all possible inputs. Our reduction employs list-decodable codes to transform an average-case algorithm into an algorithm with one-sided error, which are known to admit efficient reductions from the work of Gola, Shinkar, and Singh [Gola et al., 2024]. Our reduction is more concise and straightforward compared to the recent work of Hirahara and Shimizu [Hirahara and Shimizu, 2025], and improves the overhead in the running time incurred during the reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".