MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7081668154 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17114816

The source data of DFIT measurements and the input for wellbore breakout analysis

2025· dataset· en· W7081668154 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsBreakoutBoreholeWellboreFault (geology)Source codeShear (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The source data for DFIT measurements and the input for wellbore breakout analysis are deposited in Zenodo and are available online (Xu et al., 2025). (10.5281/zenodo.17114817) It is divided into 5 tabs organised as follows: 1. The first one is a summary 2. The second tab contains DFIT measurements of Well W3 (near fault F1) 3. The third tab contains DFIT measurements of Well W5 (far from fault F1) 4. The fourth one contains shear stress results with detailed locations for Table 1 5. The fifth one contains the input for the Matlab code developed by Wang et al. (2021) used for the borehole beakout calculation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→