MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7081928672 · doi:10.48809/priftracepb2509

Truth spoken, progress delayed

2025· report· en· W7081928672 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePeace Research Institute Frankfurt · 2025
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrime ministerPoliticsBlueprintCommissionAction (physics)Post truth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ten years ago, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada released a landmark report exposing the devastating legacy of the Indian Residential School System. Its 94 Calls to Action were framed as a blueprint achieving healing, justice, and reconciliation. But a decade later, how many of those calls were taken up? Has the political will endured – or has it quietly faded into silence? Whether reconciliation advances or remains mired in symbolism and piecemeal tactics now depends on the newly elected Prime Minister Mark Carney and his government. This Policy Brief revisits the commission’s work, political progress, and ongoing challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0150.016
Scholarly communication0.0350.029
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0080.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeace Research Institute Frankfurt→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→