MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081930220 · doi:10.11159/htff25.172

Observation of the Time-Invariant Nature of Evaporating Thin Films: Insights from SPR Imaging

2025· article· en· W7081930220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvaporationWettingDisjoining pressureSurface plasmon resonanceDissipationThin filmMonolayerKinetic energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evaporating thin film (ETF) plays a critical role in heat dissipation due to the substantially enhanced evaporation flux. Despite its fundamental importance in interfacial evaporation dynamics, direct experimental characterization of the ETF [1-3] has remained a significant challenge, resulting in a limited understanding of its temporal evolution. This presentation provides the first direct experimental evidence demonstrating the time-invariant nature of ETF profiles during the pinning stage of droplet evaporation, offering novel insights into interfacial evaporation mechanisms using the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging [4-5]. The ultra-thin liquid film profiles are measured under varying surface wettability conditions through a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) on a gold substrate. A theoretical model incorporating kinetic theory and the augmented Young-Laplace equation is also employed to quantitatively examine the finite evaporation flux in the ETF region. The findings reveal that the ETF profile remains time-invariant during the pinned stage, exhibiting local equilibrium characteristics, and theoretical predictions show good agreement with experimental observations. Notably, it is found that surface wettability has a minor influence on variations in ETF profiles, and the disjoining pressure is found to be higher on hydrophilic substrates, contributing to further thinning of the ETF. Furthermore, these findings indicate that higher surface wettability enhances ETF thinning, thereby improving heat dissipation via maximum evaporation flux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207