Leveraging deep Learning for Efficient Intrusion Detection in IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) technology is experiencing rapid development and increasing use in a variety of applications, making it a potential target for cyber-attacks. Machine learning and deep neural network techniques are an effective way to address these challenges and improve IoT security. This research aims to design a deep learning techniques for intrusion detection in an Internet of Things environment with limited resources. The research focuses on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of current model using artificial intelligence and LSTM algorithms, ensuring reliable and effective security in the IoT environment. The proposed model is evaluated using a realistic data set, Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity Internet of Things 2023 Dataset (CICIoT2023) devices, and using performance metrics, namely Accuracy, Precision, F1 Score, and Recall. The results show its compatibility and effectiveness in a real environment, with 99.1% accuracy recorded. This paper is considered an important contribution to the field of IoT security and provides an effective methodology for developing advanced security solutions in the IoT environment that enhance traffic analysis, identify abnormal behavior, and take the necessary measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".