MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081958241 · doi:10.1109/tia.2025.3608682

A Supervised Machine Learning and Temporal Convolutional Network Based Framework for Denial-of-Service Attack Detection and Mitigation

2025· article· en· W7081958241 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimensionality reductionFeature extractionSupervised learningPhasorTestbedSupport vector machineHyperparameterNetwork packetPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a supervised machine learning (ML) based strategy for detecting Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) based mitigation approach for synchrophasor data transmitted from Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) to a Phasor Data Concentrator (PDC). The proposed work addresses the urgent need for real-time detection and reconstruction of DoS-affected data loss in synchrophasor networks, which is essential for secure and reliable grid operation. It enables deployment-ready detection with low computational overhead. After decoding and storing synchrophasor data for training, feature extraction is performed, followed by dimensionality reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Subsequently, the dataset is classified using various ML models with their hyperparameters selected via Randomized Search Cross-Validation (RSCV). A meta-learning layer is introduced that adapts to any dataset based on its statistical features and selects the best-performing model, ensuring accurate DoS attack detection and minimal detection time. The total meta-training time is approximately 3.4<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">s</i>, and detection time is around 1<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ms</i>. Further, a Euclidean distance-based trust score is used to trigger retraining in the presence of concept drift. Once a DoS attack is detected, TCN reconstructs the lost data using historical data within approximately 2<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ms</i>, mitigating adverse effects. The methodology is validated using a cyber-physical testbed simulating synchrophasor data flow from multiple PMUs to a PDC under various DoS scenarios. The outcomes indicate that the meta-learning layer selects the optimal model, and TCN effectively reconstructs missing phasors. The overall processing time (1<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ms</i>+2<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ms</i>=3<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ms</i>) remains within the packet reporting time of 16.67<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ms</i> for a 60 <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Hz</i> system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207