MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081968784 · doi:10.11159/icmie25.176

Transport Solutions of Biot’s Equations at Subsonic Loads

2025· article· en· W7081968784 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Control theory (sociology)Boundary value problemMathematical model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The investigation of transport movement in tunnels, transported cargo and fluids in pipelines leads to model problems on the action of moving loads in a continuous medium.A feature of such problems is that the transport speed significantly affects the type of differential equations, which parametrically depend on the ratio of the transport speed to the wave propagation speeds in the medium.Therefore, when solving transport problems, different motion modes arise, which affects the type of transport equations on which the properties of solutions and the choice of methods for constructing them depend.In this case, it becomes necessary to study the effect of transport speed on the surrounding massif depending on its physical and mechanical properties.This paper is devoted to studying the dynamics of a two-component Biot's model under transport loads whose speed does not exceed the speeds of wave propagation in media (subsonic loads).The Green's tensor of transport equations is constructed and, on its basis, their solutions are obtained for any type of transport loads from the class of generalized functions, both regular and singular, concentrated on moving surfaces and lines.Numerical calculations illustrating the wave dynamics of a two-component Biot's model at subsonic speeds of transport loads are carried out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207