MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards a machine-learning-based large eddy simulation of offshore wind farms

2025· article· en· W7081975725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandMitacs
KeywordsEnstrophyTurbulenceIntermittencyTurbulence modelingTurbulence kinetic energyLarge eddy simulationFlow (mathematics)Scalability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a Scale-Adaptive Machine-Learning Subgrid-Scale model developed to predict subgrid-scale turbulence within the framework of large eddy simulations for offshore wind farms. Unlike traditional subgrid-scale models that rely on blending of isotropy and scale similarity, the proposed approach leverages a supervised learning framework based on physically informed flow observables derived from mixed modelling theory and Leonard decomposition. The model employs a novel encoder–decoder neural network architecture designed to capture coherent enstrophy dynamics and multi-scale turbulence interactions. Skip connections and latent representations serve as implicit filters, enabling the model to represent both structural and functional aspects of turbulence. Trained using data from a scale-adaptive LES method, outcome of the presented model has been validated for its ability to learn and reproduce key turbulence characteristics, such as intermittency and energy transfer, across resolutions and flow scenarios. A-priori tests confirm its capacity to capture statistical turbulence features, while a-posteriori tests demonstrate that the model dynamically predicts eddy viscosity and produces flow fields comparable to high-resolution LES with traditional SGS models. When applied on coarser meshes, the model maintains accuracy, as evidenced by agreement in the ratio of subgrid to total kinetic energy. These findings support the potential of this machine-learning-based model as a physics-aware, scalable modelling approach for complex turbulent flows. • ML–LES integration using scale-adaptive and mixed modelling : Introduces SAM-SGS, a model that learns enstrophy dynamics and energy cascade. • Encoder–decoder architecture improves LES performance : Uses skip connections to boost interpretability, gradient flow, and spatial detail. • Scalable and generalizable AI for offshore LES : SAM-SGS adapts to flow variations, enabling robust LES in wind farm applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it