MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081977552 · doi:10.1109/tcns.2025.3609433

Dynamic Event-Triggered DMPC With Variable Prediction Horizon for Disturbed Nonlinear Multiagent Systems

2025· article· en· W7081977552 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Variable (mathematics)State variableStability (learning theory)Multi-agent systemScheme (mathematics)Horizon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the formation stabilization problem of continuous-time nonlinear multiagent systems subject to state constraints, input constraints, and external disturbances. To solve this issue, a dynamic event-triggered distributed model-predictive control algorithm is developed, integrating a control configuration that simultaneously considers both the triggering scheme and the variable prediction horizon. Specifically, a dynamic event-triggered mechanism based on feasibility analysis is proposed to adaptively adjust the triggering threshold, thereby reducing computational and communication burdens while preventing Zeno behavior. Meanwhile, a variable prediction horizon scheme is designed for each agent to effectively shorten the prediction horizon of the involved optimal control problem, which reduces the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, theoretical conditions are established to ensure the recursive feasibility and closed-loop stability of the algorithm. Finally, theoretical results are verified through a numerical example with comparison analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network SystemsSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207